| |
Achievement
Goal: Discuss what treaties are and why they were made between
Indian tribes and the US Government.
Time: Two class periods
Core: History, Civics/Government
Background: In North America , indigenous
peoples were dispossessed of their lands by the US Government and non-native
settlers. The clash of cultures that began in 1492 was inevitable given
the settlers’ drive
to control new lands and the ways in which they justified the acquisition
of these lands. For Europeans, land that was not actively improved
or permanently settled on was not inhabited or owned. In contrast,
the concept of land ownership was foreign to Native people. Particular
native families or tribes might have definite but informal rights to
use a particular natural resource or natural area, but it was never
understood that people could own the land. These differences in thought
about the use, occupation, and ownership of land sparked serious conflict
between native peoples and would-be settlers over land in North America.
Originally, treaties were made to reduce animosities between settler
governments and tribes, delimit non-native settlement, or to establish
relations of trade, peace and war. As the story of the Two-Row Wampum
belt reveals in this lesson, tribes were concerned with continuing
their existence as an independent self-governing people. Gradually,
however, as non-natives became much more numerous and gained military
advantages over Indians, treaties became a means by which tribes attempted
to retain portions of their original territories or self-governance
in the face of an overwhelming number of settlers and soldiers encroaching
on their lands.
Today, treaties have a legacy that is both tragic and a source of
hope. Most treaties were broken or violated in one way or another by
the US Government, resulting in massive losses of land that were set
originally aside for the exclusive use and occupancy of native people.
In addition to the attendant problems land loss created for tribes,
the promise of food, goods, services, and payments were not always
delivered as specified in the treaty. New non-native settlements were
allowed on Indian lands even before the ink had dried on some treaties.
Generally, Native people were at a disadvantage in the treaty-making
process due to the fact that the treaties were almost always set down
in English and because the only recourse tribes had to uphold the treaty
was through non-native legal systems.
On the other hand, treaties are very important in modern times. Many
treaties today protect tribes and support the fact that tribes are
sovereign governments and have certain rights, such as the right to
hunt and fish on ceded lands. However, for tribes to realize the powers
the treaty gives them, tribal members must become familiar with treaties
and ways of protecting the tribal community.
Preparation:
- Review the Two-Row Wampum lesson plan at
PBS’s website, http://www.pbs.org/warrior/content/modules/tworow.pdf.
(This document is in PDF format).
- Have something that you know the children
in the class will value, such as a bowl of M&Ms, nuts, or jelly
beans, stickers, potted flowers, or popular toys. These items will
be the items for which the children will be making a treaty.
- Using the blank
treaty PDF document on this site, prepare a blank treaty on legal size paper. Include
a title, a place for the date and a blank spot for the students
to write on. Draw a vertical line to form two columns – one
titled U.S. government, and the other the name of the tribe you
select to be represented.
Student Activity:
- Discuss the concept of treaties with the students. Treaties became
the legal basis used by the U.S. government to acquire and change
ownership of lands originally occupied by American Indian peoples.
- Discuss the story of the Two-Row Wampum
belt with the students. Read to them G. Peter Jemison’s quote
at the beginning of the lesson. Explain to the children that treaties
were, at first, agreements between tribes and non-native to co-exist.
Ask the children to think out loud about the meaning of the belt.
- Interpret the treaty found in (2) below for the students. Note
the opening statement that mentions the imminent loss of hunting.
Why would hunting no longer be available to the Indians? Compare
this treaty to the one made with the Makah found at (3). Read in
particular Article 4 of the Makah treaty. Emphasize that all treaties
are different and it is important to pay attention to the treaties.
- Divide the students into two groups.
- One group will represent the U.S. government. This group will
select one person as a spokesperson and one person as a scribe.
- The other group will represent tribal people. This group will
select two people as spokespeople.
- The students will role-play a treaty-signing between the two above
groups. The teacher will speak with each group separately to give
them clues regarding their roles.
- U.S. Government group:
- The students will work as a team and decide
what they would like to offer the tribe in exchange for the items
of value. Ideas include CD’s, hats, jewelry or other items
of interest to their age group. Or, suggest to the Government
group that they make promises to share the items for which they
are negotiating with the tribal members.
- Once they have determined what items,
goods or payment the government group will offer, ask the scribe
to prepare a treaty on the legal paper. However, ask the scribe
to use shapes that ‘look’ like
letters, but actually are not. When finished have them roll it
up.
- When presenting the treaty, the spokesman will “tell” the
tribe what the treaty says and what they would like to give in
exchange for the items of value.
- They will give the treaty to the tribe and ask if it looks o.k.
They will also tell the tribe to carefully read the treaty. The
tribe will realize they cannot read it. Have the U.S. spokesman
assure the tribe that the treaty says just what they were told.
- When the tribe asks for the goods promised them in the treaty,
this group will tell them they will get them later.
- If the negotiations break down, the teacher can step in and
warn the tribal group that he or she is siding with the government
group, and will take away the valuable items if the tribal group
does not agree to make the treaty.
- Tribal Group:
- As the U.S. government group is working on the treaty, have the
tribal group discuss the items for which they are making the treaty.
For example, if you have chosen to have them negotiate over the
potted flowers, the tribal group can name the plant, talk about
how much water it needs, how much light it needs etc.
- When this group is told what the treaty promises in exchange
for the items, they will discuss the offer. Some students should
oppose it, but in the end, it will be accepted and signed.
- After the items are given to the U.S. government, this group
will ask for the goods promised them in the treaty.
- When the treaty is finished, call a meeting of the two groups.
Have them sit on opposite sides of the room. They can sit on the
floor, or you may wish to have a table they can sit on opposite sides
of. The students will role-play the signing of the treaty, using
the above ideas to guide them.
- After the treaty negotiation, all students will sign in their
appropriate column. The items will be given to the U.S. government
group.
- The role-play will end after the tribal group is told by the U.S.
government group that they will get their promised goods later.
- Have the students return to their desks. Have them discuss their
thoughts and feelings about the treaty enactment.
Evaluation:
- From the initial discussion about the Wampum
belt, assess the student’s understanding that treaties were
made because tribes wanted to remain distinct, independent communities.
Observe if the children understand that the reasons for the treaties
changed over time, as non-native settlers became more powerful
and numerous.
- From the discussion of the two actual treaties, assess if the
children grasp that all treaties are different.
- From the role playing and discussion
afterwards, observe if the students understand the problems inherent
in treaty-making during the later part of the 19th century.
Resources:
|
|